Matasar criticizes the "inordinate scrutiny" given to law schools
In the first segment of a two-part interview responding to David Segal's critique of law school economics, Richard Matasar says that law schools receive "inordinate scrutiny."
Monday, August 08, 2011
In the first segment of a two-part interview responding to David Segal's critique of law school economics, Richard Matasar says that law schools receive "inordinate scrutiny."
Race to the Top
MoneyLaw Essentials
- Reforming the USN&WR law school rankings
- A bibliometric manifesto
- Three deans
- Talent versus character
- The folklore of rankings
- The utility law teacher
- The South Carolina bar exam scandal
Swamp Fox news
The controversy is not going away
Lost Causes
Previous Posts
- The economics of law school admissions
- Which side are you on?
- Fidelity in transition
- Tenure in disfavor among college presidents
- Is there academic freedom in this controversy?
- U.S. Supreme Court Prediction Market
- Pants Down Part 2
- Pants Up
- Pants Down
- Class Participation: How and Why?
Subscribe to MoneyLaw
Subscribe to MoneyLaw by e-mail 
The MoneyLaw bookshelf
This blog's literary inspiration
This blog's cinematic inspiration
The Official Guide to ABA-Approved Law Schools
2 Comments:
I think any profession that claims to work in the public interest and teach ethics would be equally scrutinized when its secrets are exposed.
Perhaps this is one instance in which those who would savor every bite of the cake "must take the bitter with the sweet." Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 154 (1974).
Post a Comment
<< Home